• Immediately condemn the anti-gayLGBTQIA+ legislation, and the threat of the death sentence recently introduced in Uganda, and call on the Ugandan government

3) The Greens of the Americas remains committed to the environmental fight and social justice, therefore, calls to retake and renew what was established in the latest

Global Youth Movements like Fridays for Future made it very clear: Young people don’t want to accept that they are overheard, patronised or ignored.made it very clear: Young people want to be heard, represented and a spot at the negotiation table. They demand clearly to shape their own future - also on a political level.

engaging in civil society movements, UN constituencies and Green parties. We stand in solidarity with these youth movements which share the values of the Global Green Charter and commit ourselves to be their allies and support them in reaching their goals and help them be recognised in

Biodiversity is fundamental to human well-being, a healthy planet, human well-being, and economic prosperity for all people. The United Nations has acknowledged biodiversity loss

• For the creation and mapping of more biological corridors worldwide, and ensuring the connectivity of transboundary ecosystems.

Noting that at this time due to global pressures as a result of escalating climate change and the impact of the war in Ukraine, there is a renewed push to maintain and increase nuclear energy, this Resolution seeks to focus on the ongoing threat of nuclear waste and its disposal, especially in the Pacific.

Recalling all relevant international instruments, particularly the Convention and Protocol on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and

Recommending that:

ThatWe the Global Greens:

6. Support the Green Party of Japan and the Green Party Korea in its campaigntheir campaigns against further nuclear energy plants and against the dumping of nuclear waste in the Pacific.

We, 1.a. The Global Greens Congress, in consultation and co-operation with First Nations Indigenous Tribal Peoples attending and represented at Global Greens Congress 2023, refers the formation of a Global Greens First Nations Network, along with similar Resolutions (if appropriate, 34 and 37) intending to form Working Groups and Networks, to the Global Greens CoOrdination for further administration of Mandates, Terms of Reference and Membership set up.
1.b. Global Greens First Nations Indigenous Tribal Peoples attending Global Greens Congress 2023 approach the Federations and proposers of Resolutions 32 (and 34, 37 if appropriate) to indicate and sign up their support and commitment to a First Nations Indigenous Tribal Peoples Global Greens Network to assist the process of the GGCoOrdination setting up these Networks (and Working Groups).
Initial Draft Resolution is now referred to Global Greens CoOrdination for further administration:
"We, as ‘citizens’ of the planet, members of the Global Greens, and First Nations Indigenous Tribal Peoples,

[Noting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) as adopted by the General Assembly on Thursday, 13 September 2007.]]"

• Intensify work on a global UN declaration on animal welfare.

• Work for a ban on the trade in live wild animals.

• Work to bring about a global regulatory framework against the routine use of antibiotics in animal husbandry.

• Work to reduce the global diary and meat consumption.

• fundamental human rights, or face the risk of death, torture, or other inhuman treatmentinhumantreatment. Also call for governments to respect the rights of people displaced because of the negative effects of anthropogenic climate change, give them fair treatment and do not remove them to a third party country as part of the asylum process.

We, Greens Parties and We the Greens Movement and Greens Parties resolve to develop effective global, regional/Federation, national and local policies on Climate Migration and Displacement; and address increasing climate change impacts as adverse drivers of climate migration and displacement, a major factor ofincreasing insecurity, uncertainty and vulnerability toamongst all climate migrants; and we must supportin climate-impacted environments; and lobby for strengthened protections, improved supports and accessible assistance to people migrating in the context of climate change;migrants; and create new, flexible and rights-respecting regular pathways adequate to the magnitude of current and future climate change and environmental impacts; and such initiatives should respond to the acute and immediate crises and plan strategically for long-term impacts of climate change; and as per the agreements contained in the 2018 Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) and all other relevant instruments.

• promotes the rights and custodianship of First Nations Indigenous Tribal Peoples

The Global Greens:

• We willWill continue to monitor women's human rights violations in various parts of Asia and conduct joint action.

• TheWill exhort the governments of each country demand andto act and to speak out about the violence against women in Asian countries.

• To enhance women's political power, the world's Green Party members share experiences and cooperate with each other.

• Will share experiences and cooperate with each other to enhance women's political power.

• ActWill act across borders to stop the undervaluation, exploitation and exploitation of women's labor and reproduction activities.

• Throughout Asia, Will promote institutional changes are being madethroughout Asia for a gender-equal society.

The Ecological Movement of Venezuela (Green Party) has developed for years the fight to defend the most vulnerable groups, natural resources and the catastrophic impact of extractivist projects. For this reason, within the framework of climate democracy, and in the construction of the legal framework for Ecocide to be considered an international crime and marked in international treaties.

1) The Greens, in their respective jurisdictions, will work for the construction of the legal framework for Ecocide to be considered an international crime and marked in international treaties.
2) The Global Greens support the Ecological Movement of Venezuela (Green Party) in its fight against the extractive project named "Arco Minero", which constitutes one of the largest ecocides and ethnocides in the world.

We seek articulation and alliances, to defend, recover, protect and make visible the largest ECOCIDE AND ETHNOCIDE in the world that occurs in the Bolivar State in Venezuela, called "Arco Minero"

SPANISH

The Global Greens make a call:1) To the governments of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, to take urgent actions to protect the ecosystems of the South Atlantic Ocean, currently the richest fishing ground on the planet.

2) To the governments of Argentina and the United Kingdom, to resume the negotiations to find a peaceful and definitive solution to the sovereignty dispute of the Malvinas Islands, which includes the conservation of fishing resources and the defense of marine ecosystems.

3) To the United Nations and international organizations to strenghten the commitment for the conservation of fishing resources in the South Atlantic Ocean, and to address this issue at the highest level, in all the relevant forums.

1)El Partido Verde de Argentina realiza un llamamiento frente a la situación que amenaza al ecosistema en el Atlántico Sur, desde el límite correspondiente a las costas del sur de Brasil, de Uruguay, principalmente de Argentina, que corresponde a la mayor extensión atlántica de todos los países de América Latina y el Caribe dado su proyección hacia la Antártida, corresponden al caladero más rico del planeta, en la actualidad.

En la extensión atlántica que proyecta las aguas del mar argentino y de nuestro territorio que se extiende hacia la Antártida, la sustracción de los recursos marinos mediante el ejercicio de la pesca no declarada y no reglamentada es una de las más graves en todo el planeta. Sus consecuencias golpean a nuestros recursos marinos y a los del océano Atlántico, en general, por su interconexión a través del movimiento contínuo de las especies y de la dinámica de supervivencia de la fauna marina.

Flotas asiáticas, en particular chinas, y europeas, entre otras, son las responsables de este daño irreparable por incidir en la extinción de las especies, en una situación grave para los derechos humanos por tratarse de pesca no regulada y no regamentada, con tripulantes que son trabajadores sometidos a prácticas contrarias a los derechos humanos, a más de las dispuestas por la Organización Internacional del Trabajo.

La pesca es realizada mayormente fuera del sistema satelital de rastreo, porque dichas embarcaciones lo apagan, en general.

A fines de los 90 estas flotas se volvieron ávidas, se incorporaron numerosos pesqueros chinos especialmente de frente a las costas patagónicas argentinas.

Se trata de más de 400 embarcaciones en el Atlántico Sur y algo menos en el Pacífico Sur dedicadas a la pesca de calamar.

La flota china es la más grande, sin perjuicio de que pescan flotas de Taiwán, Corea del Sur y España, que son las mayores en las aguas circundantes de Sudamérica. Frente a la Patagonia hay entre 550 a 600 embarcaciones.

La flota china está subsidiada en el combustible, la tecnología satelital y la asistencia para detectar controles y no ser observada, y la construcción de los barcos pesqueros.

Los reclamos internacionales son constantes y el trabajo de la Armada Argentina para intentar evitar este crimen contra los recursos pesqueros, no detienen a cientos de buques chinos que están pescando ilegalmente en el mar argentino; este saqueo podría agotar la especie del calamar dientuso en esta zona.

El estudio del InSight Crime, con el Centro de Estudios Latinoamericanos y Latinos de la Universidad Americana (CLALS), descubre que los barcos del país asiático llevan a cabo la pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada a 201 millas marítimas de la costa, que es el límite de la línea de Zona Económica Exclusiva (ZEE) y en las aguas internacionales y capturan toneladas de calamar. Cientos de estos barcos usan maniobras y violan el límite para seguir pescando fuera de la zona permitida

El jefe del Observatorio Marítimo Naval de Argentina, Daniel Coluccio, publicó que “más allá de la milla 200 no hay control” y estos barcos aprovechan para pescar allí “lo que pueden día y noche”, por lo que consideró que “en algún momento el recurso va a disminuir”. Cuando Coluccio escucha la radio en el mar los mensajes son en portugués, ruso y, sobre todo, chino.

La plataforma marina de la Argentina proporciona zonas de alimentación fértiles para la vida debajo del agua y, además, tiene una profundidad relativamente poco profunda de 200 metros. Allí hay grandes cantidades de plancton y prosperan el bacalao del sur, o merluza negra, la langosta, el calamar y otras valiosas especies.

Estos pesqueros usan redes de arrastre, que no se emplean a 5.000, 6.000 metros, pero se utilzan a 200, 250 metros”.

Los impactos ambientales, no solo se limitan a la sobrepesca, sino también a la captura de especies amenazadas, de mamíferos marinos, de aleteo de tiburón, a la toneladas de residuos y aceites que vierten al mar sin ningún control. A los derechos humanos, todo el trabajo semi esclavo de esta flota, los impactos sobre la salud y la situación de estos tripulantes es gravísimo, a los aspectos sociales y económicos sobre los países de la región, sobre sus economías pesqueras ya que esta flota opera en los mismos recursos necesarios para las flotas artesanales locales.

Esto daña a todo el ecosistema marino porque el calamar o pota es una de las especies más importantes de toda la cadena alimentaria del océano, que está en el centro de la cadena alimentaria de todo el ecosistema del Pacífico y del Atlántico Sur.

El ecosistema está amenazado y el peligro es grave.

2). La “Cuestión de las Islas Malvinas”, disputa entre la Argentina y el Reino Unido por la soberanía de las Islas Malvinas, Georgias del Sur, Sandwich del Sur y los espacios marítimos circundantes, ha estado presente en las Naciones Unidas desde los orígenes mismos de esta Organización.

En la conferencia de San Francisco la delegación argentina presentó una reserva de derechos según la cual la República Argentina no aceptaba, en ningún caso, que el sistema de Administración Fiduciaria –que supervisaba la administración, con miras a su independencia, de los denominados “territorios no autónomos”- pueda ser aplicado a, o sobre, territorios que le pertenezcan, ya sea que ellos estén sujetos a reclamo o controversia, o estén en posesión de otros Estados.

El 16 de diciembre de 1965 la Asamblea General adoptó la resolución 2065 (XX), primera referida exclusivamente a la Cuestión Malvinas, a través de la cual reconoció la existencia de una disputa de soberanía entre la Argentina y el Reino Unido e invitó a ambos países a negociar para encontrar una solución pacífica a la controversia. Malvinas es una de las formas de colonialismo al que debe ponerse fin, subyace una disputa de soberanía entre los gobiernos argentino y británico, y la forma de encontrarle una solución es a través de las negociaciones bilaterales entre ambos gobiernos.

Luego de la adopción de esta resolución se inició un proceso de negociación bilateral respecto de la soberanía sobre las Islas Malvinas, Georgias del Sur, Sandwich del Sur y los espacios marítimos circundantes, en los cuales ambas Partes propusieron distintas alternativas de solución que no llegaron a concretarse y en 1973 la Asamblea General declaró la necesidad de acelerar las negociaciones en curso, e instó a los dos gobiernos a proseguirlas sin demora por la resolución 3160 (XXVIII).

Después del conflicto del Atlántico Sur de 1982, la Asamblea General en noviembre de 1982 adoptó la resolución 37/9 que pidió a los dos gobiernos reanudar las negociaciones que permitan encontrar una solución pacífica a la disputa de soberanía, reiterada por las subsiguientes resoluciones de la Asamblea relativas a la Cuestión de las Islas Malvinas.

Es demasiado importante que la reanudación de las negociaciones entre la Argentina y el Reino Unido de respuesta a la necesidad de encontrar una solución pacífica y definitiva a la disputa de soberanía donde se incluya el tema de la conservación de los recursos pesqueros y la defensa de los ecosistemas.

3). Es preciso frenar el ataque contra sus recursos pesqueros, la ONU y los organismos internacionales tienen un compromiso con su conservación. Reclamamos que se aborde la cuestión al más alto nivel, en todos los foros donde se traten asuntos ambientales.

El océano es la fuente de los sistemas mundiales que hacen de la Tierra un lugar habitable para la humanidad, la lluvia, el agua potable, el estado del tiempo, el clima, los litorales, nuestra comida, el oxígeno del aire que respiramos en una inmensa proporción los proporciona y regula el mar.

ENGLISH

1) The Green Party of Argentina makes an appeal against the situation that threatens the ecosystem in the South Atlantic, from the limit corresponding to the coasts of southern Brazil, Uruguay, mainly Argentina, which corresponds to the largest Atlantic extension of All the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, given their projection towards the Antarctic, correspond to the richest fishing ground on the planet, at present.
In the Atlantic extension that projects the waters of the Argentine sea and of our territory that extends towards Antarctica, the theft of marine resources through the exercise of unreported and unregulated fishing is one of the most serious on the entire planet. Its consequences affect our marine resources and those of the Atlantic Ocean, in general, due to their interconnection through the continuous movement of species and the survival dynamics of marine fauna.
Asian, particularly Chinese, and European fleets, among others, are responsible for this irreparable damage for influencing the extinction of species, in a serious situation for human rights because it is unregulated and unregulated fishing, with crew members who They are workers subjected to practices contrary to human rights, in addition to those ordered by the International Labor Organization.
Fishing is done mostly outside of the satellite tracking system, because such vessels turn it off, in general.
At the end of the 1990s, these fleets became avid, numerous Chinese fishing boats were incorporated, especially off the Argentine Patagonian coast.
There are more than 400 vessels in the South Atlantic and a little less in the South Pacific dedicated to squid fishing.
The Chinese fleet is the largest, notwithstanding the fact that fleets from Taiwan, South Korea and Spain fish, which are the largest in the surrounding South American waters. Off Patagonia there are between 550 to 600 boats.
The Chinese fleet is subsidized in fuel, satellite technology and assistance to detect controls and not be observed, and the construction of fishing boats.
International claims are constant and the work of the Argentine Navy to try to prevent this crime against fishing resources does not stop hundreds of Chinese vessels that are fishing illegally in the Argentine sea; this poaching could deplete the species of toothy squid in this area.

The InSight Crime study, with the Center for Latin American and Latino Studies of the American University (CLALS), discovers that the Asian country's boats carry out illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing 201 nautical miles from the coast, which it is the limit of the Exclusive Economic Zone (ZEE) line and in international waters and they catch tons of squid. Hundreds of these boats use maneuvers and violate the limit to continue fishing outside the allowed zone.
The head of the Argentine Naval Maritime Observatory, Daniel Coluccio, published that "beyond mile 200 there is no control" and these boats take the opportunity to fish there "what they can day and night", for which he considered that "at some point the resource will decrease. When Coluccio listens to the radio at sea, the messages are in Portuguese, Russian and, above all, Chinese.
The Argentine marine shelf provides fertile feeding grounds for life below water and also has a relatively shallow depth of 200 meters. There are large amounts of plankton there, and southern cod, or toothfish, lobster, squid, and other valuable species thrive.
These fishing vessels use trawl nets, which are not used at 5,000, 6,000 meters, but are used at 200, 250 meters”.
The environmental impacts are not only limited to overfishing, but also to the capture of endangered species, marine mammals, shark finning, tons of waste and oil that are dumped into the sea without any control. To human rights, all the semi-slave work of this fleet, the impacts on the health and situation of these crew members is very serious, to the social and economic aspects of the countries of the region, on their fishing economies since this fleet operates in the same resources needed for local artisanal fleets.
This harms the entire marine ecosystem because the squid or squid is one of the most important species in the entire ocean food chain, which is at the center of the food chain of the entire Pacific and South Atlantic ecosystem.
The ecosystem is threatened and the danger is serious.
2). The "Question of the Malvinas Islands", a dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom over the sovereignty of the Malvinas, South Georgia, South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime areas, has been present in the United Nations since the very origins of this organization.
At the San Francisco conference, the Argentine delegation presented a reservation of rights according to which the Argentine Republic did not accept, in any case, that the Trusteeship system – which supervised the administration, with a view to its independence, of the so-called “territories non-self-governing” - may be applied to, or over, territories belonging to it, whether they are subject to claim or controversy, or are in the possession of other States.
On December 16, 1965, the General Assembly adopted resolution 2065 (XX), the first to refer exclusively to the Malvinas Question, through which it recognized the existence of a sovereignty dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom and invited both countries to negotiate to find a peaceful solution to the dispute. Malvinas is one of the forms of colonialism that must be ended, there is an underlying sovereignty dispute between the Argentine and British governments, and the way to find a solution is through bilateral negotiations between both governments.
After the adoption of this resolution, a bilateral negotiation process began regarding sovereignty over the Malvinas, South Georgia, South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime spaces, in which both Parties proposed different solution alternatives that did not reach agreement. materialize and in 1973 the General Assembly declared the need to speed up the ongoing negotiations, and urged the two governments to continue them without delay by resolution 3160 (XXVIII).
After the 1982 South Atlantic conflict, the General Assembly in November 1982 adopted resolution 37/9 that asked the two governments to resume negotiations to find a peaceful solution to the sovereignty dispute, reiterated by subsequent resolutions of the Assembly relating to the Question of the Malvinas Islands.
It is very important that the resumption of negotiations between Argentina and the United Kingdom respond to the need to find a peaceful and definitive solution to the sovereignty dispute, which includes the issue of the conservation of fishing resources and the defense of ecosystems.
3). It is necessary to stop the attack against their fishing resources, the UN and international organizations have a commitment to their conservation. We demand that the issue be addressed at the highest level, in all forums where environmental issues are discussed.
The ocean is the source of the world systems that make the Earth a habitable place for humanity, the rain, the drinking water, the weather, the climate, the coastlines, our food, the oxygen in the air we breathe in a an immense proportion is provided and regulated by the sea.

SPANISH

The Global Greens support the reconversion of the foreign debt of Argentina, based not only on financial criteria, but also considering climate and environmental needs, for the compliance of the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda.

El Partido Verde de la República Argentina propone una resolución para la reconversión de la deuda externa de la República Argentina a partir de un nuevo imperativo financiero y económico, el Imperativo Climático y Ambiental, alineados al cumplimiento del Acuerdo de Paris y a la Agenda 2030.

Creemos que es el momento para presentar una nueva propuesta de negociación, respecto del pago de la deuda, teniendo como referencia el canje de desembolsos, por proyectos concretos en producción de energías alternativas y saneamientos ambientales. Y que es absolutamente necesario incluir en los fundamentos técnicos, no solo los de tipo económico–financieros, sino en el mismo nivel de importancia, los fundamentos de lucha contra el cambio climático y para ello necesitamos el apoyo de los Partidos Verdes a nivel global.

Teniendo en cuenta que:

• Argentina y el planeta se halla en estado de emergencia ambiental y climática. La “emergencia ambiental” no es una metáfora, se palpa, se ve y, sobre todo, la sufren millones de personas en forma de inundaciones, sequías, incendios, contaminación del aire y de los cursos de agua, que enferman a los niños y niñas y las personas de menores recursos. También la falta de cloacas y de agua potable que padecen millones de argentinos, a lo largo y ancho de todo el país, afectan su salud y la calidad de vida.

• Argentina tiene niveles de pobreza históricos. Según el Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (Indec) INDEC en el segundo semestre del año pasado, la pobreza fue de 39,2% y la indigencia de 8,1%. Estos porcentajes implican que en la Argentina hay 18.679.605 de pobres y 3.859.816 millones de indigentes; esta cifra surge de una extrapolación de la cifra de los conglomerados urbanos registrados por el Indec a todo el país y permite medir con mayor precisión el fenómeno de la pobreza en las áreas no alcanzadas por las estadísticas oficiales. Lo que indica que en este momento estamos sobre el 50% de argentinas inmersos en la pobreza, en un país que ronda el 10% de inflación mensual.

• La protección de los bosques, fundamentales para enfrentar las consecuencias del cambio climático, no cuenta con el presupuesto asignado por ley, los gobiernos sucesivamente incumplen las leyes ambientales. El resultado es que la Argentina ostenta el puesto número 9 entre los 234 países que menos cuidan sus bosques, según el índice que publica la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. La pérdida de nuestros bosques y humedales principalmente a manos de la creciente sojización y de la expansión ganadera e inmobiliaria, con incendios récord en el país, que consumieron más 450.000 hectáreas en 14 provincias y emitieron 3.427.563 toneladas de CO2.

• Nuestro país está fuertemente afectados por las consecuencias del Cambio Climático debido a su posición geográfica, su litoral costero de casi 7.000 km, y nuestra población híper-concentrada en la Pampa húmeda, dónde ya se hacen evidentes los fenómenos climáticos extremos -inundaciones y sequías-, la pauperización de los suelos, la elevación de los niveles del mar, la degradación de las costas, la desertificación de grandes extensiones, las crisis hídricas del centro y NOA, las inundaciones y sequias del NEA, la perdida de grandes masas de glaciares, la aparición de enfermedades vinculadas a las olas de intenso calor y el impacto que todo esto provoca en los sistemas de salud, que generan pérdidas económicas de más del 1 % del PBI por año.

• La economía decrece y los fondos existentes están destinados al extrativismo y no al cuidado de los bienes naturales y del ambiente.

Sabemos que la deuda externa, en las actuales condiciones ambientales, sociales y económicas de la Argentina no es pagable.

El crédito acordado a la Argentina por el Fondo Monetario Internacional, que constituye el origen de una especulación en espiral ascendente, que se reitera en numerosos países en desarrollo endeudados y redundó en la omisión del deber de conservar y dar un uso racional a la naturaleza en beneficio de las generaciones futuras, con el agravante de que fue factor de destrucción de bosques, contaminación y aceleración del calentamiento global.

Invertir en la protección de nuestros ecosistemas debe ser la prioridad para garantizar los beneficios de nuestros bienes naturales para nuestro pueblo en el combate contra la pobreza, aumentar la resiliencia frente a los desastres naturales, hacer sostenible nuestros compromisos externos y garantizarnos el acceso al crédito.

Existe un esquema posible de renegociación de deuda sobre bases ambientales. Argentina puede recomprar indirectamente su deuda con activos denominados en moneda local, a través del patrocinio de programas de conversión con terceros que disponen de divisas.

La lucha contra el cambio climático requiere justicia y equidad de acreedores y deudores.

Es indudable que el mundo y nosotros necesitamos crear una respuesta de fondo, radical, hacia un desarrollo social y económico equitativo, viable y ambientalmente sostenible, en línea con la respuesta ante el mayor desafío de la humanidad, que es la lucha contra el cambio climático.

Por todo lo expuesto es que solicitamos el apoyo de los Partidos Verdes a nivel global para exigir que se considere el mecanismo de Reconversión Verde de la deuda externa a fin de apalancar el desarrollo sostenible de la Argentina, modificando su matriz energética, la transformación sustentable de la agricultura y la ganadería, el acceso universal al agua potable y el saneamiento, la recuperación de la masa forestal perdida y el apoyo a la industrialización en sectores que garanticen la sustentabilidad de la productividad para seguir creando riqueza para nuestro pueblo, alineados con los compromisos asumidos en el Acuerdo de Paris y en la agenda 2030.

ENGLISH

The Green Party of the Argentine Republic proposes a resolution for the reconversion of the foreign debt of the Argentine Republic based on a new financial and economic imperative, the Climate and Environmental Imperative, aligned with compliance with the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda.
We believe that it is time to present a new negotiation proposal, regarding the payment of the debt, having as a reference the exchange of disbursements, for specific projects in the production of alternative energies and environmental sanitation. And that it is absolutely necessary to include in the technical foundations, not only those of an economic-financial nature, but at the same level of importance, the foundations of the fight against climate change and for this we need the support of the Green Parties at a global level.
Taking into account that:
Argentina and the planet is in a state of environmental and climatic emergency. The "environmental emergency" is not a metaphor, it is felt, seen and, above all, millions of people suffer it in the form of floods, droughts, fires, air pollution and water courses, which make children sick and girls and people with fewer resources. Also the lack of sewers and drinking water suffered by millions of Argentines, throughout the country, affect their health and quality of life.
Argentina has historical levels of poverty. According to the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (Indec) INDEC in the second semester of last year, poverty was 39.2% and indigence 8.1%. These percentages imply that in Argentina there are 18,679,605 poor and 3,859,816 million indigent; This figure arises from an extrapolation of the number of urban conglomerates registered by INDEC to the entire country and allows a more precise measurement of the phenomenon of poverty in areas not covered by official statistics. Which indicates that at this moment we are over 50% of Argentines immersed in poverty, in a country that is around 10% monthly inflation.
The protection of forests, essential to face the consequences of climate change, does not have the budget assigned by law, governments successively fail to comply with environmental laws. The result is that Argentina holds the 9th position among the 234 countries that take the least care of their forests, according to the index published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The loss of our forests and wetlands mainly at the hands of the growing soybean production and the expansion of livestock and real estate, with record fires in the country, which consumed more than 450,000 hectares in 14 provinces and emitted 3,427,563 tons of CO2.
Our country is strongly affected by the consequences of Climate Change due to its geographical position, its coastline of almost 7,000 km, and our hyper-concentrated population in the humid Pampas, where extreme climatic phenomena -floods and droughts- are already evident. , the impoverishment of the soil, the rise in sea levels, the degradation of the coasts, the desertification of large areas, the water crises in the center and NOA, the floods and droughts of the NEA, the loss of large masses of glaciers, the appearance of diseases linked to waves of intense heat and the impact that all this causes in health systems, which generate economic losses of more than 1% of GDP per year.
The economy is declining and the existing funds are earmarked for extractivism and not for the care of natural assets and the environment.
We know that the external debt, in the current environmental, social and economic conditions of Argentina, is not payable.
The credit granted to Argentina by the International Monetary Fund, which constitutes the origin of an ascending spiral speculation, which is reiterated in numerous indebted developing countries and resulted in the omission of the duty to conserve and make rational use of nature in benefit of future generations, with the aggravating circumstance that it was a factor in the destruction of forests, pollution and acceleration of global warming.
Investing in the protection of our ecosystems must be the priority to guarantee the benefits of our natural assets for our people in the fight against poverty, increase resilience in the face of natural disasters, make our external commitments sustainable and guarantee our access to credit.
There is a possible debt renegotiation scheme on environmental grounds. Argentina can indirectly repurchase its debt with assets denominated in local currency, through the sponsorship of conversion programs with third parties that have foreign currency.
The fight against climate change requires justice and equity of creditors and debtors.
There is no doubt that the world and we need to create a fundamental, radical response towards equitable, viable social and economic development.

Declare that the new millennium provides a defining point to begin that transformation

• 9.3 Will campaign for greater power for countries of the South in the UN, by working to abolish the veto power in the Security Council, to remove

• 8.10 Demand that corporations and communities reduce, reuse and recycle waste, adopt circular economy
  strategies, aiming for a zero waste economy which replicates a natural ecosystem.

• 4.11 Will support the conservation and
  sustainable use of oceans, including the creation of international marine
  reserves, the prevention of acidification, among other actions.

• 3.2 Adopt the target of limiting CO2 levels in the atmosphere to 450ppm in the shortest period possible.

• 3.2 Will adopt goals and targets agreed by scientific consensus.

committed to limiting global temperature rise to no more than 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. Global emissions will need to peak well before 2020 to have a chance to stay within this temperature limit.